"Why We Die" is a non-fiction book by Indian-origin Nobel laureate Venkatraman Ramakrishnan. The book delves into longevity and current research efforts to extend human lifespan.
Before reading the book, I wondered about why we die from an evolutionary perspective. I initially thought that if humans lived forever, or even significantly longer, it would lead to resource scarcity. Since evolution prioritizes the transmission of genes to offspring, it seemed that extended lifespans wouldn't offer an evolutionary advantage. I was reassured to discover that Venki Ramakrishnan had similar initial thoughts. However, this reasoning seems flawed. If an individual developed a genetic variation that promoted a longer lifespan, that gene could, theoretically, provide an advantage in passing on their genes. This seems logical, at least for men. However, women experience menopause long before they die. The reason for this seems to be that evolution has prioritized successful gene transmission. Genes that are beneficial early in life for this purpose may contribute to aging later in life. Mutations that increase lifespan often reduce fecundity (the ability to reproduce).
The book explores the causes of aging, such as the constant damage to DNA and the declining efficiency of DNA repair mechanisms as we age. The cells in our bodies continually divide. Telomeres, the protective ends of DNA, shorten with each division, eventually preventing further cell division. Cellular senescence (inability of cells to divide and properly function) occurs as we age.
Biology is so complex that significant progress in extending human lifespan may not be seen for several decades. Currently, the most effective ways to promote healthy aging are exercise, sleep, and a diet rich in fruits and vegetables. Caloric restriction (fasting or consuming fewer calories) has demonstrated increased longevity in some studies, but it can also cause problems like muscle loss.
Finally, Venki Ramakrishnan poses the question of whether living longer is truly desirable. Perhaps, he suggests, we find meaning in life precisely because it is finite. Would I want to live for 400 years like a Greenland shark? Many people would say yes. Monogamy would be an exception over such an extended lifespan. Many people dislike their work but continue doing it for financial reasons. 400 years would be an exceptionally long time to spend doing something one dislikes.